Isn’t feeding the homeless an empathic act?
Isn’t feeding the homeless an empathic act? How about housing a runaway child at your place or feeding a stray cat or pigeons living under a neighbor’s roof?
When two empathic concerns collide, we must apply the wisdom learned from the five stages of understanding the empathic action.
In Stage 1, we are concerned about one’s basic survival needs, such as food and shelter. Some people will argue it is a constitutional human right.
However, some parents of runaway children may argue it is not their survival issue because they chose to run away to escape responsibility, and some may argue that homeless people choose to live outdoors to escape responsibility or continue an addictive lifestyle, not as a desperate survival measure.
In Stage 2, we are concerned about setting boundaries out of safety and health concerns for the general public, usually performed by police officers who are hired civil servants to show no emotion or empathy to perform their unpleasant duty of saying no.
In stage 3, laws or ordinances will be used to justify the enforcement of the boundaries to maintain the stability of the social/government system.
When these three values of the society collide, we need to use the higher order wisdom such as the real empathic approach at Stage 5 to resolve the conflict.
In Stage 4, due to highly individualistic orientation, we suggest feeding the homeless at other locations, such as school auditoriums, or unused parking lots, as long as the population does not pose a threat to the general public or the community in general.