The post Murders Against Their Parents: Can These Be Related to their Childhood Silent Traumas (Kim, 2022) Manifested in their Later Lives? appeared first on PsychoEdu Global Media.

One such psychological phenomenon that often goes unnoticed but profoundly impacts relationships is “projective identification.”

Coined by Melanie Klein, a renowned psychoanalyst, projective identification involves projecting one’s feelings, thoughts, or aspects of the self onto another person.

This process can take various forms and has the potential to either strengthen or strain relationships.

In the psychoeducation course, “Object Relations Training for Parents, Teachers, and Coaches.” we will delve into projective identification, exploring its different types and providing real-life examples to shed light on how it manifests in relationships.

Understanding these types can help us become more aware of our own behaviors and reactions in relationships and foster healthier connections with those around us.

So, what exactly is projective identification?

Projective identification is when someone unconsciously sees their own thoughts, feelings, or qualities in another person and treats that person as if they possess those thoughts, feelings, or qualities.

It’s like taking your own positive or negative emotions or traits and projecting them onto someone else, sometimes causing misunderstandings or conflicts in relationships.

For example, if you’re angry but don’t want to admit it, you might act as if the other person is angry, even though they might not be.

And if you experience encouragement and empathy through counseling or coaching, you tend to become the same way toward others.

Many of us remember the success story of Coach Hiddink for Korea in the World Cup in 2002.

Our feelings and thoughts can affect how we see and treat others without realizing it.

Now, let’s explore the different types of projective identification we’ll cover in this course:

We have fear-based, dependence-based, power-based, competition-based, rebellion-based, co-dependence-based, insecurity-based, anger and hostility-based, sexuality-based, anxiety and guilt-based, ingratiation-based, obsession and compulsion-based, encouragement-based, freedom-based, and empathy-based projective identification.

These outlines provide a brief understanding of each type of projective identification, their definitions, and examples of how they may manifest in relationships.

In our Object Relations training course, we will explore each type of projective identification in more detail, examining the dynamics, consequences, and strategies for addressing these relationship patterns.

Understanding these dynamics can empower individuals to navigate their relationships with greater awareness and empathy.

Learn more about our course, “Object Relations Training for Parents, Teachers, and Coaches.”https://psychoeduglobal.com/psychoeducation_courses/

Let’s embark on this journey of self-discovery and relationship growth together.

The post Are My Feelings From You Or Me?: Fifteen Types Of Projective Identification to Learn to Improve Our Relationships With Partners, Children, Students, And Clients appeared first on PsychoEdu Global Media.

The study, published in the Journal of Personality, argues for a dimensional approach to personality disorders, which are often the extreme, maladaptive variants of traits that can be found to some degree in all individuals. Traditional models tend to overlook the nuanced spectrum of personality, especially when it comes to traits that are socially aversive or detrimental to interpersonal relationships.

Scholz and colleagues identify seven key traits that are indicative of what they term “antagonistic psychopathology”: dishonesty, grandiosity, callousness, risk-taking, impulsivity, hostility, and low agreeableness. These traits, they argue, cannot be neatly categorized into the existing personality models, which tend to focus on more socially desirable or neutral traits.

The implications of this research

The study’s dimensional approach to personality disorders implies that equating antagonism solely with low agreeableness is an oversimplification. It fails to capture the behavioral and cognitive aspects of antagonism adequately. The Dark Factor of Personality (D) emerges as a more balanced and comprehensive representation of antagonistic traits, suggesting that a blend of multiple basic personality dimensions is necessary to fully understand these traits.

By acknowledging and empirically testing these additional dimensions of personality, psychologists can develop a more comprehensive understanding of individuals who may struggle with these traits. This, in turn, can lead to more effective treatment options, tailored to address the complex interplay of traits that contribute to a person’s overall personality profile.

Moreover, this study challenges the psychological community to rethink the way we classify and interpret personality. It underscores the importance of considering the full spectrum of personality traits, including those that are often stigmatized or misunderstood. In doing so, it opens the door to a more inclusive and accurate understanding of human nature.

As we continue to explore the depths of the human psyche, studies like that of Scholz et al. remind us that the dark side of personality is not just a footnote in psychological assessment but a significant chapter that deserves our attention and understanding.

Its Implication in relation to the proposed PPPI (Planet Phase Personality Inventory) proposed by Roland Kim (2022).

The study by Scholz et al. is a call to action for the psychological community to expand its horizons and embrace a more dimensional approach to personality. This approach not only enhances our understanding of personality disorders but also paves the way for more effective and targeted treatment strategies through such instruments as PPPI that captures both bright and dark personality within each stage of the five personality dimensions. By doing so, we can hope to not only better understand the darker aspects of human nature but also to provide more nuanced support to those whose personalities traverse these shadowed paths.

reference:

Scholz, D. D., Hilbig, B. E., Moshagen, M., & Thielmann, I. (2021). Antagonistic psychopathology: A dimensional approach to personality disorders. Journal of Personality, 89(3), 449-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12601

The post Beyond the Surface: Exploring the Dark Side of Personality appeared first on PsychoEdu Global Media.

https://www.bbc.com/news/health-43343807

However, what the study failed to find is that

1. Genes can be modified epigenetically by the environment, especially childhood trauma.
2. Genes cannot explain different levels of empathic ability such as cognitive empathy, identification, sympathy, and empathy.
3. Self-report studies have potential self-serving bias.

The post Genes have only a 10% role in empathy, a study says. appeared first on PsychoEdu Global Media.

Based on these various psychoanalytic theorists’ work, a universally observable pattern of human psychological development was identified. There appears to be a broad consensus among the theorists that humans have unconscious emotional needs related to caregivers’ early environments. In infancy, individuals share emotional bonding, attachment, or symbiosis with their mothers, experiencing a mutually dependent relationship for the first year of their lives.

Beyond mainstream psychoanalytic theorists, a similar stage-based theory has been proposed by other theorists, such as Kazimierz Dabrowski’s (1964) Theory of Positive Disintegration. Here, he claimed that psychological growth occurs in a series of disintegrations and reintegration, through which an individual shapes or changes his or her conception of the world. His outlined growth process follows a strikingly similar developmental sequence, as shown in Table 1I that the 5-Stage process described in the proposed model. His Primitive/Primary Integration at Level 1 is characterized by selfishness and egocentrism; the Unilevel Disintegration at Level 2 is characterized by a transitional period in developmental crises; involuntary Spontaneous Multilevel Disintegration at Level 3 is characterized by vertical conflicts; the Directed Multilevel Disintegration at Level 4 is characterized by a deliberate, conscious, and self-directed life; and the Secondary Integration at Level 5 is characterized by an integrated and harmonious visionary character with creative expression and empathy. Together, these levels correspond with the five stages of the proposed model.

Table 1I. Dabrowski’s (1964, 1967) Theory of Positive Disintegration from the 5-Stage framework

Furthermore, cultural mythologist Joseph Campbell (1968, 1988),  in his The Hero with a Thousand Faces, viewed all great mythic narratives as variations of a single great story, or a mono-myth, of individual development. It is similar to the proposed model, where a common pattern is discerned, regardless of the origin or time of creating the myths. In his interview with Bill Moyers, Campbell (1988) states:

The stages of human development are the same today as they were in ancient times. As a child, you are brought up in a world of discipline and obedience and dependent on others. All this has to be transcended when you come to maturity so that you can live not in dependency but with self-responsible authority. If you can’t cross that threshold, you have the basis for neurosis. (p. 70)

He further claims that all myths deal with “the maturation of the individual, from dependency through adulthood, through maturity, and then to exit, and then how to relate to this society and how to relate this society to the world of nature and the cosmos (p. 32).” Therefore, Campbell’s theory supports the idea that the socio-cultural theory could be applied across cultures, societies, and times.

Table 1J. Joseph Campbell‘s Theory from the 5-Stage framework

The post A1. An Integrated Theory of Personality Development appeared first on PsychoEdu Global Media.

I have attempted to integrate various psychoanalytic and psychological theories to find the universal emotional and socio-cultural development theory. This book may fill the gap in the theories of human development introduced by Ken Wilber’s Integral Theory and Clare Graves’s Spiral Dynamics that have been criticized for lacking mainstream academic support due to the absence of academic rigor for the complexity of the model, narrow confinement in spiritual or business orientation. Realizing its astonishing similarity to Beck and Cowan’s (1996) spiral color spectrum of management leadership, I can consider Stage 1 of my model to match with the people of beige, purple, red, and blue, Stage 2 with orange, Stage 3 with green, Stage 4 with yellow and Stage 5 with Turquoise in Beck and Cowan’s system.

Kim, R. (2021a). The Five Stages of Civilization: From an Integrated Psychological and Psychoanalytic Perspective, Vol. 1 Personality Development. Living Free Publishing Co.

Kim, R. (2021b). The Five Stages of Civilization: From an Integrated Psychological and Psychoanalytic Perspective, Vol. 1l. Socio-cultural Development. Living Free Publishing Co.

The post My 5 Stage theory of civilization and its relevance to the past theories of human development appeared first on PsychoEdu Global Media.